TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claim of mistrial error was not available on appeal because party made no objection or argument at trial that the court’s admonition was insufficient
• noting that Indiana legislature declined to adopt the America Law Institute's \different approach\ which requires proof of safer alternative design as an element of a design defects claim
• declining to expand the statutory standard of care for product liability claims alleging a design defect
• declining to find error in the absence of a formal Rule 702 inquiry which was not requested by either party and the substance of which was served in large part by an extended bench colloquy
• noting a claim on appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence is not waived “when a party fails to object to jury instructions informing the jury about the elements of an issue and explaining how to proceed upon its findings”
• \We decline to require proof of any additional or more particular standard of care in product liability actions alleging a design defect.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).