Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 374 A.2d 824
  • 1977 Del. LEXIS 666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expert testimony generally required in homicide prosecution for causation defense based on unskilled treatment by attending physician
  • expert testimony generally required in homicide prosecution for causation defense based on unskilled treatment by attending physician
  • “[I]f a wound, even if not mortal, is a causal factor in bringing about a death, a defendant will be liable for homicide.”
  • ‘‘[a]ny limitation on the voir dire imposed by the [t]rial [c]ourt will not be disturbed absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion to the prejudice of the defendant’’
  • expert testimony ordinarily required to show wound not dangerous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.