Supreme Court of Delaware· 9/10/1982
Dutton v. State
Citations
- 452 A.2d 127
- 1982 Del. LEXIS 444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that instruction on lesser included offense is not required on facts similar to those in Sivri
- holding that instruction on lesser included offense is not required on facts similar to those in Sivri
- distinguishing instances in which defendant’s absence is a per se reversible error from those where absence is reversible error only if prejudicial
- finding no support in the record for requested lesser included offense instruction
- finding no support in the record for requested lesser included offense instruction
- defendant’s subsequent disclosure of matter communicated to him in an attorney-client context constituted waiver of the attorney-client privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, McNEILLY, Quillen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-02-21· cited 430×
- People v. Ralph International ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 425×
- Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 228×
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-02-29· cited 204×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-07-31· cited 124×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-03· cited 118×
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-10· cited 115×
- Probst v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-10· cited 97×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-02-25· cited 75×
- Campbell v. BurrisThird Circuit· 2008-02-14· cited 69×
- Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-04-14· cited 66×
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-10-04· cited 54×
- Bullock v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-06-27· cited 48×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-10-20· cited 44×
- Floray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-12-02· cited 42×
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-07-28· cited 36×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-01· cited 36×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-03-28· cited 34×
- Van Arsdall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-11-19· cited 32×
- Zhurbin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-10-17· cited 27×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 642×
- United States v. BrownSixth Circuit· 1978-02-07· cited 114×
- General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1960-11-04· cited 111×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-04-26· cited 76×
- Tyre v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-02-05· cited 69×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-06-06· cited 66×
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1965-11-29· cited 66×
- Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware· 1961-03-09· cited 60×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-04-28· cited 59×
- United States v. Ian WoodnerSecond Circuit· 1963-05-28· cited 58×
- Bunch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-09· cited 55×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1974-02-15· cited 52×
- Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware· 1970-12-17· cited 49×
- Styler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-05-01· cited 47×
- Parson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-02-16· cited 47×
- Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-05-13· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.