Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 223 N.W.2d 229
  • 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence “are not favored in the law and should be closely scrutinized and sparingly granted”
  • holding motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence “are not favored in the law and should be closely scrutinized and sparingly granted”
  • holding motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence “are not 21 favored in the law and should be closely scrutinized and sparingly granted”
  • holding, with respect to ordinary negligence, that “[a]n injury is the proximate cause of resulting death although the deceased would have recovered had he been treated by the most approved surgical methods or by more skillful methods, or with more prudent care”
  • holding, with respect to ordinary negligence, that “[a]n injury is the proximate cause of resulting death although the deceased would have recovered had he been treated by the most approved surgical methods or by more skillful methods, or with more prudent care”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rawl-Ings, Legrand, Rees, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.