Skip to main content

Woodward v. State

Citations

  • 635 So. 2d 805
  • 1993 WL 398698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding counsel’s closing argument was ineffective when counsel admitted Woodward’s guilt and said he could not ask the jury to spare Woodward’s life other than on “redeeming love,” a non-mitigating circumstance
  • finding defense strategy of conceding murder but arguing against capital murder did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
  • stating counsel were ineffective for not realizing they could have presented mental-illness testimony without \opening the door to unlimited character evidence\
  • stating counsel were ineffective for not realizing they could have presented mental-illness testimony without “opening the door to unlimited character evidence”
  • “Where the same counsel represents the defendant at trial and on direct appeal, the claim is procedurally viable on application for post-conviction relief.” (citing Perkins v. State, 487 So. 2d 791, 792-93 (Miss. 1986))
  • finding similar strategy within range of competent representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prather

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.