Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 684 So. 2d 1179
  • 1996 WL 233855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that instruction that used the word\unanimous\ in regard to aggravating circumstances, but not in regard to mitigating circumstances, is not error
  • affirming admission of photos of victim’s excised larynx, heart, vaginal and anal area, as well as photos of stab wound to victim’s chest and heart
  • A contemporaneous objection to the allegedly prejudicial remarks in a prosecutor’s closing argument is required.
  • “Wide latitude is generally available to counsel to argue his case on closing argument.”
  • contemporaneous objection rule is applicable in death penalty cases
  • contemporaneous objection rule is applicable in death penalty cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

220 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

180 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.