Skip to main content

Cole v. State

Citations

  • 666 So. 2d 767
  • 1995 WL 702782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that applicability of the contemporaneous objection rule \is not diminished in a capital case\
  • holding that post-conviction relief does not lie for facts and issues which were litigated at trial or on direct appeal
  • holding that applicability of the contemporaneous objection rule \is not diminished in a capital case\
  • holding that defense counsel simply had no reason to object under Mississippi law
  • an evidentiary hearing is not necessary where the allegations in a petition for post-conviction relief are specific and conclusory
  • an evidentiary hearing is not necessary where the allegations in a petition for post-conviction relief are specific and conclusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, C.J., and Sullivan and McRae

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

289 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.