Skip to main content

Woodruff v. State

Citations

  • 608 N.W.2d 881
  • 2000 Minn. LEXIS 208
  • 2000 WL 375007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that' exculpatory information disclosed late in trial may not be prejudicial if defendant had opportunity to fully examine witnesses with the evidence and could not show that court’s remedy for the violation had been inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.