Skip to main content

Pederson v. State

Citations

  • 692 N.W.2d 452
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 64
  • 2005 WL 427600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because materiality issues under Brady combine issues of fact and law, the proper standard of review is de novo
  • “because materiality issues under Brady combine issues of fact and law, the proper standard of review is de novo”
  • “[W]e hold the postconviction court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that because the first prong of Caldwell was not met, appellant’s claim . . . failed.”
  • analyzing the materiality under the third Brady prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz, Anderson, Barry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.