Richard S. Brokowski v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have an intent to file a claim for VA benefits
• holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have intent to file a claim for VA benefits
• holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have intent to file a claim for VA benefits
• holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have intent to file a claim for VA benefits
• holding that the plain language of the regulations requires a claimant to have an intent to file a claim for VA benefits
• holding that a claimant may satisfy the requirement to identify the benefit sought by referring to a body part or system that is disabled or by describing symptoms of the disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).