Veterans Claims· 3/3/2006

Dingess - Hartman v. Nicholson

Citations

19 Vet. App. 473
2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 102
2006 WL 519755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the “content of such notice must be defined by a reasonable and liberal reading of the application actually filed”
holding that the “content of such notice must be defined by a reasonable and liberal reading of the application actually filed”
holding that establishing veteran status “is necessary to substantiate service connection, and thus, [VCAA] notice must be provided on how [that] element [ ] may be established”
holding that when a claim for service connection has been proven, the purpose of § 5103(a) has been satisfied, and notice under its provisions has been satisfied
holding that establishing veteran status “is necessary to substantiate service con nection, and thus, [VCAA] notice must be provided on how [that] element [ ] may be established”
holding that any defect in timing of notification cannot constitute prejudicial error if VA follows proper subsequent remedial processes to cure such defect, thereby providing the claimant a meaningful opportunity to participate in the processing of his or her claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Kasold, Hagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.