Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 12/20/2001

Wensch v. Principi

Citations

  • 15 Vet. App. 362
  • 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1500
  • 2001 WL 1642673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when there is extensive factual development in a case that indicates no reasonable possibility that any further assistance would aid the appellant in substantiating his claim, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 does not apply
  • compliance with the VCAA is not required if no reasonable possibility exists that any notice or assistance would aid the appellant in substantiating the claim
  • compliance with the VCAA is not required if no reasonable possibility exists that any notice or assistance would aid the appellant in substantiating the claim
  • it is not error for the Board to favor the opinion of one competent medical expert over that of another when the Board gives an adequate statement of reasons and bases for doing so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Holdaway, Ivers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.