· 6/8/2005
Clarence W. Kowalski v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 19 Vet. App. 171
- 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 362
- 2005 WL 1351531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the Veteran
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
- holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greene, Kasold, Hagel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.