Skip to main content
· 6/8/2005

Clarence W. Kowalski v. R. James Nicholson

Citations

  • 19 Vet. App. 171
  • 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 362
  • 2005 WL 1351531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the Veteran
  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran
  • holding that a medical opinion cannot be disregarded solely on the rationale that the medical opinion was based on history given by the veteran

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Kasold, Hagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.