Skip to main content
· 5/29/1992

Hertz v. Cleary

Citations

  • 835 P.2d 438
  • 1992 Alas. LEXIS 53
  • 1992 WL 118708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court did not abuse discretion in holding that motion was untimely
  • “[A]s a pro se plaintiff, Hertz may not properly represent a class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.