Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 5/12/2004
Wolf v. State
Citations
- 137 S.W.3d 797
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4358
- 2004 WL 1109804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- weighing the first factor in the defendant’s favor because a similar amount of time had elapsed
- “Although not flagrant, the purpose of the misconduct was to illegally detain Wolf until an unsubstantiated hunch could be acted upon.”
- “Although not flagrant, the purpose of the -9- 04-13-00701-CR misconduct was to illegally detain Wolf until an unsubstantiated hunch could be acted upon.”
- the stop may be lengthened to accommodate its new justification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray, Vance, Reyna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Willis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-05-10· cited 149×
- Haas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-08-03· cited 141×
- Bell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-09-12· cited 29×
- Jessica Pineda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-08-13· cited 6×
- HAMAL v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-10-27· cited 4×
- Benito Elizondo-Vasquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-08-20
- Jesus Ordaz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-10-10
- Alfonso Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-09-04
- Jose Zuniga v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-02-07
- Rudy Byron v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2006-05-31
- Ricardo Serbantez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2006-05-31
- Kenneth D. Ford v. Charles C. BellTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1999-02-03
- Michael Wayne Bell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-09-12
- Justin Amar Bell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-12-09
- Charlie Wray Newsom v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-04-22
- Berdell Willis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2006-01-18
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Courtney Michelle RicksTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-06-22
- Willie Jess Tennyson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-09-17
- State v. Jose Angel IbanezTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-07-06
- Neil E. Lawrence v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-08-01
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-04· cited 1,223×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-18· cited 1,033×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-05· cited 905×
- Balentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-03· cited 883×
- Armendariz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-10· cited 831×
- Walter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 562×
- Rayford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-11-19· cited 305×
- United States v. JonesFifth Circuit· 2000-11-20· cited 237×
- Manzi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-23· cited 228×
- United States v. DortchFifth Circuit· 1999-12-23· cited 200×
- United States v. Chavez-VillarrealFifth Circuit· 1993-09-22· cited 182×
- Dyar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-23· cited 161×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.