M.D. Tennessee· 5/12/1983
WLWC Centers, Inc. v. Winners Corp.
Citations
- 563 F. Supp. 717
- 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 701
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding mark relatively weak in part because of plethora of registered marks with same word
- finding a mark was weak where, among other things, it consisted of a word that was in common use
- discussed the eight factors to be examined in determining the likelihood of product confusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burke-Parsons-Bowlby Corporation v. Appalachian Log Homes, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1989-05-22· cited 117×
- Lane Capital Management, Inc. v. Lane Capital Management, Inc.S.D. New York· 1998-07-31· cited 27×
- Men of Measure Clothing, Inc. v. Men of Measure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-01-28· cited 10×
- Reed v. Amoco Oil Co.M.D. Tennessee· 1984-10-03· cited 9×
- Tandy Corp. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 1984-03-01· cited 7×
- Wynn Oil Co. v. ThomasM.D. Tennessee· 1986-06-25· cited 7×
- Truckstops Corp. of America v. C-Poultry Co. Ltd.M.D. Tennessee· 1983-12-27· cited 5×
- Mister Twister, Inc. v. JenEm Corp.S.D. Ohio· 1989-03-10· cited 3×
- Ameritech, Inc. v. American Information Technologies Corp.N.D. Ohio· 1985-04-19· cited 3×
- Pingel Enterprise, Inc.Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 1998-04-14
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1976-02-26· cited 777×
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court· 1938-12-12· cited 625×
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Second Circuit· 1979-04-11· cited 453×
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1980-05-02· cited 381×
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationThird Circuit· 1978-12-12· cited 279×
- The Vision Center, Cross v. Opticks, Inc., Will Ross, Inc. And G. D. Searle & Co., CrossFifth Circuit· 1979-05-23· cited 170×
- American Heritage Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Heritage Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossFifth Circuit· 1974-05-13· cited 162×
- King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen, Inc.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-06-06· cited 155×
- Mason County Medical Association v. KnebelSixth Circuit· 1977-09-20· cited 124×
- Armstrong Cork Company and Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. World Carpets, Inc., Cross-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1979-08-10· cited 89×
- Albert v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 83×
- Ralston Purina Company v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.S.D. New York· 1972-05-01· cited 69×
- Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut CompanySixth Circuit· 1973-05-02· cited 67×
- Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesSixth Circuit· 1982-11-18· cited 58×
- Exquisite Form Indus., Inc. v. Exquisite Fabrics of LondonS.D. New York· 1974-07-24· cited 58×
- Jewel Tea Co., Inc. v. KrausSeventh Circuit· 1951-03-06· cited 47×
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.S.D. New York· 1980-01-22· cited 45×
- California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Sunkist Baking Co.Seventh Circuit· 1947-12-23· cited 41×
- J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-02-11· cited 40×
- General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co.W.D. Michigan· 1964-02-12· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.