General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs theory that “public confusion automatically follows the use of the trademark ‘Cadillac’ upon any other product, no matter how unrelated it may be to Cadillac automobiles”
• leading questions improper because they suggest the specific answer desired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).