Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e find it important to note that Hindu admitted that there has been no loss of sales due to the infringement. Such a finding generally makes the case unexceptional for purposes of awarding fees under § 1117.”
• distinguishing case law in which defendant deliberately infringed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).