J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The confusion involved, of course, is not a confusion of goods but a confusion of business ….”
• “The confusion involved, of course, is not a confusion of goods but a confusion of business ….”
• “The presumption of use emanating from the fact of registration relates back to the filing date of the application on which the registration is predicated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).