Karki v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that one of the BIA’s findings was unsupportable on the record and then examining the BIA’s alternative finding on a different element
• holding that a petitioner would meet the willful blindness standard if he could show that “the government would likely turn a blind eye to his torture”
• explaining that aliens must prove their eligibility for asylum with objective, credible, and specific evidence
• concluding the BIA failed to consider certain evidence and the record as a whole did not reasonably support the BIA’s findings
• vacating a BIA decision on asylum and withholding of removal after finding the BIA had committed legal error
• granting petition for review as to CAT claim where petitioner provided “evidence that the government regularly fails to take action to prevent or punish Maoist acts of torture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).