Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 122 S.W.3d 871
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 9910
  • 2003 WL 22725590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mere summation of evidence that did not require defendant to personally rebut the State’s argument was not a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify
  • holding that mere summation of evidence that did not require defendant to personally rebut the State’s argument was not a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify
  • holding that mere summation of evidence that did not require defendant to personally rebut the State = s argument was not a comment on the defendant = s failure to testify
  • holding known risk that administration of drug to person with decedent’s condition was contraindicated and could be lethal was extreme risk and satisfied objective malice prong
  • holding, in sexual assault case, that question asking whether jurors could convict in absence of scientific or medical evidence, was proper commitment question because State could obtain conviction in absence of such evidence
  • holding State’s comment as proper summation of evidence where it specifically pointed out lack of testimony from other witnesses concerning any motive for female witnesses to falsely accuse appellant of sexual assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sue Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.