Skip to main content

Fuentes v. State

Citations

  • 664 S.W.2d 333
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor may not accuse defense counsel of bad faith or insincerity or discuss counsel’s “usual antics”
  • holding that prosecutor may not accuse defense counsel of bad faith or insincerity or discuss counsel’s “usual antics”
  • concluding argument that defense counsel was “in bad faith like usual” and that evidence of police misconduct was “garbage” warranted reversal
  • concluding argument that defense counsel was “in bad faith like usual” and that evidence of police misconduct was “garbage” warranted reversal
  • holding prosecutor‘s comments that defense counsel was acting in bad faith and arguing ―a bunch of garbage‖ warranted reversal
  • holding that prosecutor = s comments that defense counsel was A in bad faith like usual @ and that the evidence of police misconduct he was seeking to elicit was A garbage, @ were manifestly improper, harmful, and prejudicial, and thus constituted reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Davis, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.