Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/2/2007
Wilson v. State
Citations
- 921 A.2d 881
- 174 Md. App. 434
- 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the distinction between raw and burnt marijuana odors in a probable cause analysis
- discussing the distinction between raw and burnt marijuana odors in a probable cause analysis
- “eliminat[ing] the need to distinguish between burnt, burning, or raw [cannabis]” when determining whether probable cause exists to search a vehicle
- “eliminat[ing] the need to distinguish between burnt, burning, or raw [cannabis]” when determining whether probable cause exists to search a vehicle
- addressing the search of a vehicle
- addressing the search of a vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-14· cited 71×
- In re: D.D.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-06-21· cited 11×
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-06· cited 5×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-29· cited 5×
- Senez v. CollinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-03· cited 4×
- Angulo-Gil v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-31· cited 4×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-06-28· cited 1×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-04-04
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-05-06
- 107 OAG 153 (FINAL)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2022-12-07
- People v. LealCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-07-25
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 107oag153Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2022-12-01
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Heitman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-26· cited 1,035×
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 987×
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- United States v. Joseph Noel SealsFifth Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 182×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
- United States v. McSweenFifth Circuit· 1995-05-22· cited 162×
- Wimberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-03-19· cited 138×
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 117×
- United States v. BradfordTenth Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 115×
- United States v. Douglas Merrill NielsenTenth Circuit· 1993-11-22· cited 114×
- Osban v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.