Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/22/1986
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 508 A.2d 985
- 306 Md. 332
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a separation agreement was unconscionable when it imposed upon husband a monthly support obligation that was impossible for him to perform and that was not negotiated by the parties
- observing that circuit court made no factual findings as to a confidential relationship between the husband and wife before entering into a separation and property settlement agreement
- affirming trial court’s decision setting aside a separation agreement upon a finding that it was unconscionable because it “was so oppressive on the husband that it shocked the conscience of the [trial] court”
- separation agreement procedurally unconscionable where husband unrepresented and terms of the agreement were never discussed
- judicial power exists to void a separation agreement containing unjust and unfair terms, where con sideration is grossly inadequate and burdens on one spouse are oppressive
- terms of separation agreement so inequitable that they should not be enforced where they “call[ed] for all the assets of any consequence to go to the wife” and “the obligations of supporting those assets to continue to be that of the husband”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Derby v. DerbyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-03-07· cited 94×
- Martin v. FarberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-03· cited 40×
- Cannon v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-12· cited 27×
- Stone v. Stone (In Re Stone)D. Maryland· 1987-11-09· cited 25×
- Hale v. HaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-06· cited 23×
- Karmand v. KarmandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-02· cited 18×
- Faulkner v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-22· cited 17×
- Shih Ping Li v. Tzu LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-04· cited 9×
- Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP v. ZorzitCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-25· cited 2×
- McGeehan v. McGeehanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-10· cited 2×
- Simon v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21
- Mezu v. MezuCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-29
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eckstein v. EcksteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-12· cited 30×
- Bell v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-10· cited 28×
- Blum v. BlumCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-12· cited 28×
- Spector v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-22· cited 27×
- Cronin v. HebditchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-06-15· cited 24×
- Grossman v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-03-11· cited 24×
- Great United Realty Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-30· cited 17×
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-02· cited 17×
- Straus v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-04-16· cited 9×
- McClellan v. McClellanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-07· cited 9×
- Frana v. FranaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-06-11· cited 8×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-12-05· cited 8×
- Eaton v. EatonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-07· cited 7×
- Eigenbrode v. EigenbrodeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-15· cited 7×
- Dreyer v. DreyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.