Skip to main content

Williams v. Williams

Citations

  • 508 A.2d 985
  • 306 Md. 332
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a separation agreement was unconscionable when it imposed upon husband a monthly support obligation that was impossible for him to perform and that was not negotiated by the parties
  • observing that circuit court made no factual findings as to a confidential relationship between the husband and wife before entering into a separation and property settlement agreement
  • affirming trial court’s decision setting aside a separation agreement upon a finding that it was unconscionable because it “was so oppressive on the husband that it shocked the conscience of the [trial] court”
  • separation agreement procedurally unconscionable where husband unrepresented and terms of the agreement were never discussed
  • judicial power exists to void a separation agreement containing unjust and unfair terms, where con sideration is grossly inadequate and burdens on one spouse are oppressive
  • terms of separation agreement so inequitable that they should not be enforced where they “call[ed] for all the assets of any consequence to go to the wife” and “the obligations of supporting those assets to continue to be that of the husband”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.