Karmand v. Karmand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding finding that husband was capable of supporting himself where judge “accepted the uncontradicted evidence about the state of the [husband’s] health, but found, contrary to his assertion, that the state of his health was not interfering with his ability to work”
• upholding finding that husband was capable of supporting himself where judge “accepted the uncontradicted evidence about the state of the [husband’s] health, but found, contrary to -14- his assertion, that the state of his health was not interfering with his ability to work”
• evidence supported finding that assets were dissipated prior to physical separation of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).