Skip to main content
· 1/22/1991

Faulkner v. American Casualty Co. of Reading

Citations

  • 584 A.2d 734
  • 85 Md. App. 595
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a D & O policy insured's entitlement to defense costs was limited to those claims for which coverage was found to exist
  • holding a D & O policy insured’s entitlement to defense costs was limited to those claims for which coverage was found to exist
  • holding a D&O policy insured's entitlement to defense costs was limited to those claims for which coverage was found to exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bloom, Karwacki, Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.