Skip to main content

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 247
  • 74 Md. App. 555
  • 1988 Md. App. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Mr. and Mrs. Hale went together to the office of an attorney, who represented them in prior legal matters, to draft the terms of their separation agreement
  • trial court’s finding that husband knew wife trusted him and used the trust to exact agreement from her supported striking agreement
  • “Whether a confidential relationship exists between husband and wife [is] a question of fact,” dependent on a number of factors.
  • an unconscionability analysis requires assessment of the assets passing to the parties under a separation agreement
  • terms of separation agreement substantively unconscionable where they left wife with only four percent of couple’s net worth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.