Blum v. Blum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a party challenging a separation agreement bears the burden of establishing a confidential relationship
• \When a confidential relationship has been shown to exist ... the burden [of proof] is upon the dominant party to establish that the agreement was fair in all respects.\
• “When a confidential relationship has been shown to exist ... the burden [of proof] is upon the dominant party to establish that the agreement was fair in all respects.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Drewry v. Drewry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-07-25· cited 74×
• Fultz v. Shaffer
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-29· cited 44×
• Webb v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-06-08· cited 42×
• Keshishian v. CMC Radiologists
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-07-15· cited 34×
• Rauch v. McCall
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-06· cited 30×
• Young v. Anne Arundel County
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-11· cited 29×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-12· cited 27×
• Hale v. Hale
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-06· cited 23×
• Williams v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-22· cited 15×
• Goldstein v. S & a RESTAURANT CORP.
  District of Columbia· 1985-10-30· cited 14×
• Tedesco v. Tedesco
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-10-30· cited 14×
• Dominant Investments 113, LLC v. United States Liability Insurance Co.
  D. Maryland· 2017-03-27· cited 12×
• Pantazes v. Pantazes
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-10· cited 10×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-15· cited 10×
• Shih Ping Li v. Tzu Lee
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-04· cited 9×
• Shih Ping Li v. Tzu Lee
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-21· cited 7×
• In re D.R.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-04· cited 4×
• Lloyd v. Niceta
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-08-30· cited 4×
• In the Matter of DR
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-04· cited 2×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-29· cited 2×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lysick v. Walcom
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-01-23· cited 135×
• Ishmael v. Millington
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-04-15· cited 75×
• Central Bank v. Copeland
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1862-06-03· cited 63×
• Jacober v. High Hill Realty, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-15· cited 44×
• Klemm v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-12-14· cited 43×
• Colburn v. Colburn
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-29· cited 41×
• In Re Kamp
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-10-07· cited 40×
• Crest Investment Trust, Inc. v. Comstock
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-11-15· cited 36×
• Danziger v. Danziger
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-12-06· cited 34×
• Eckstein v. Eckstein
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-12· cited 30×
• Bell v. Bell
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-10· cited 28×
• Cronin v. Hebditch
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-06-15· cited 24×
• Schweizer v. Schweizer
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-12· cited 18×
• Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Grelle
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1968-05-15· cited 18×
• Jackson v. Jackson
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-02· cited 17×
• Gibson v. McCormick
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1838-12-15· cited 13×
• Terry v. Terry
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-13· cited 11×
• McClellan v. McClellan
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-07· cited 9×
• Eaton v. Eaton
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-07· cited 7×
• Saggese v. Saggese
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-05-19· cited 7×