Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 891 S.E.2d 866
  • 317 Ga. 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even if the two alleged errors could be aggregated for cumulative-error review, the defendant failed to show that the combined prejudicial effect of these errors required a new trial
  • holding that, even if the two alleged errors could be aggregated for cumulative-error review, the defendant failed to show that the combined prejudicial effect of these errors required a new trial
  • considering several assumed errors and finding no cumulative prejudicial impact that would require a new trial
  • considering several assumed errors and finding no cumulative prejudicial impact that would require a new trial
  • considering several assumed errors and finding no cumulative prejudicial impact that would 22 require a new trial
  • assessing both claims of 20 counsel deficiency and trial court error, and holding that “[t]o establish cumulative error, [an appellant] must show that . . . at least two errors were committed in the course of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.