Skip to main content

Mann v. State

Citations

  • 22 Fla. 600

Syllabus

<p>1. The prosecution in a criminal ease cannot call witnesses to impeach the character of the defendant unless such defendant puts it in issue. Particular acts of his, or the commission of other crimes, in no way related to the one on trial, cannot thus be proved against him.</p> <p>2. In a trial for an offence, criminal in its nature (for murder), the State’s Attorney inquired of the witness if he suspected the defendant of having “ stolen his corn,” which, although objected to, was admitted, and he answered, “yes Meld, To be error, as the only effect of the evidence was to prejudice the jury against the defendant, inasmuch as it did not relate to the issue and was immaterial and irrelevant.</p> <p>3. The State’s Attorney is not necessarily compelled to give the names of witnesses not on the indictment, except upon the request of the defendant, and upon the instruction of the court.</p> <p>4. The court may instruct the jury in regard to their recommendation to mercy under the statute or may read, or cause the statute to be read to them by an officer of the court.</p>

Judges: Vanvalkenburgh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.