Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 260 S.E.2d 879
  • 244 Ga. 485
  • 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was “no duty to repeat the Miranda warnings given the day before where . . . the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation”
  • holding that the State was under no duty to repeat Miranda warnings where the defendant had received and waived his Miranda rights the day before and the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation
  • “no duty to repeat the Miranda warnings given the day before where, as here, the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation”
  • “[T]he state was under no duty to repeat the Miranda warnings given the day before where, as here, the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation.”
  • “no duty to repeat the Miranda warnings given the day before [because] the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation”
  • “no duty to repeat the Miranda warnings given the day before [because] the interviews were part of a continuing interrogation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Undercofler, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.