Skip to main content

English v. State

Citations

  • 216 S.E.2d 851
  • 234 Ga. 602
  • 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • traces of substances removed from the accused’s hands were “non-testimonial evidence” and therefore not privileged
  • no reversible error unless appellant shows prejudice and injury from overruling of objection to leading question
  • no reversible error unless appellant shows prejudice and injury from overruling of objection to leading question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Undercofler, Gunterandlngram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.