Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 764 N.W.2d 21
  • 2009 Minn. LEXIS 80
  • 2009 WL 1012458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “appellate counsel is not required to raise claims on direct appeal that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail.”
  • explaining that “appellate counsel is not required to raise claims on direct appeal that counsel could have legitimately concluded would not prevail”
  • concluding that appellant could not establish the prejudice prong
  • declining to extend implied bias to a juror who may have lied about another juror’s racist remarks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.