District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/31/1997
Williams v. State
Citations
- 714 So. 2d 462
- 1997 WL 799591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, section 90.801(2
- holding 911 tape identifying boyfriend as assailant admissible as an excited utterance
- sustaining convictions based on out-of-court statements admitted as excited utterances even though the declarants’ testimony at trial contradicted those statements
- sustaining convictions based 2 Jones also relied on another case, Dickey v. State, 147 Tex. Crim. 588, 183 S.W.2d 469 (1944
- observing “[a]s has become lamentably common in cases of domestic violence, [the victim’s] testimony before the jury was diametrically contrary to her original statements to the police”
- tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jorgenson and Sorondo, Jj., and Barkdull, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SalgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-01-26· cited 177×
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-01-07· cited 29×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29· cited 17×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26· cited 16×
- Werley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-16· cited 14×
- Rios v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. MoquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-07-10· cited 11×
- Mikler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-09· cited 8×
- Willis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-30· cited 7×
- State v. FrazierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-03· cited 4×
- Beber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-05· cited 3×
- Laur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07· cited 2×
- Baugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-31· cited 1×
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-02-13
- Mercado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-09· cited 181×
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-03-25· cited 163×
- Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.First Circuit· 1987-10-09· cited 144×
- State v. StraussWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 143×
- People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-09-18· cited 139×
- Adams v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Et Al.Supreme Court· 1986-01-13· cited 125×
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-01· cited 76×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 68×
- Kontakis v. BeyerThird Circuit· 1994-03-11· cited 65×
- Jaggers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-20· cited 64×
- State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 62×
- State v. PlantNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 57×
- GAF Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-01-27· cited 57×
- State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court· 1984-01-31· cited 53×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-12-21· cited 50×
- United States v. JacksonTenth Circuit· 1996-07-05· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-10· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.