Skip to main content

State v. Salgado

Citations

  • 974 P.2d 661
  • 126 N.M. 691
  • 1999 NMSC 008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excited utterance is ‘uniformly considered’ a firmly rooted hearsay exception and comports to Confrontation Clause requirements
  • excited utterance is `uniformly considered' a firmly rooted hearsay exception and comports to Confrontation Clause requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Serna, Minzner, Baca, Franchini, Maes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.