Baugh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that \the prior statements alone cannot sustain the defendant's conviction\
• discussing the problems with each item of \corroborating\ evidence and noting how each could be interpreted in a manner entirely consistent with innocence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Baugh v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 42×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Idaho v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
• Pardo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-26· cited 289×
• Glendening v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-01· cited 128×
• State v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-04-21· cited 118×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 68×
• Jaggers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-20· cited 64×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-12-21· cited 50×
• Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. M.B.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-29· cited 27×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-31· cited 16×
• Anderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-05-25· cited 15×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-27· cited 15×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 8×
• Brantley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-28· cited 3×
• Ticknor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-07· cited 3×