Supreme Court of Florida· 12/1/1988

Perez v. State

Citations

536 So. 2d 206
1988 WL 128166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that, as such, they “ ‘are usually irreplaceable as substantive evidence,’ ” quoting Inadi, 475 U.S. at 396, 89 L. Ed. 2d at 399, 106 S. Ct. at 1126
observing that, as such, they “ `are usually irreplaceable as substantive evidence,' ” quoting Inadi , 475 U.S. at 396, 89 L. Ed. 2d at 399, 106 S. Ct. at 1126
finding section 90.803(23) constitutional and discussing interrelation with the Confrontation Clause
“Absent a showing of an abuse of discretion . . . the trial judge’s determination that the out-of-court statements bear sufficient indicia of reliability will be upheld.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.