Willis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an excited utterance, admissible as substantive evidence, was sufficient to support a revocation of probation
• “[B]ecause there was no time schedule for payment of the costs or performance of the community service, [defendant] had until the end of his probationary term to comply with those conditions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Montano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-04· cited 13×
• Wilcox v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 11×
• S.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-12· cited 1×
• Lashawna Randall v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-06
• CHANTERIA NICOLE LACEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-02-24
• Reigh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-25
• Baretta Maurice Mathis v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-12-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 68×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-12-21· cited 50×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-22· cited 19×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-31· cited 16×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-12· cited 16×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-05· cited 12×
• Llumbet v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27· cited 6×
• McGraw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-15· cited 5×
• Gonzalez v. Roadhouse Grill, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09· cited 1×