Skip to main content

Williams v. Amoco Production Co.

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 1113
  • 241 Kan. 102
  • 93 Oil & Gas Rep. 60
  • 1987 Kan. LEXIS 303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although natural gas is both poisonous and highly flammable, operating natural gas well is not ultrahazardous
  • drilling and operation of natural gas well was not abnormally dangerous activity for purposes of determining whether to impose strict liability on gas company
  • reaffirming adoption of §§ 519 and 520 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts for determining whether an activity is abnormally dangerous
  • recognizing Restatement principles of strict liability
  • adopting test for determining whether an activity is abnormally dangerous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.