Skip to main content
· 3/6/1976

Gowing v. McCandless

Citations

  • 547 P.2d 338
  • 219 Kan. 140
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • action for permanent damages less appropriate where there is uncertainty as to future use of land, preventing accurate estimate of damages
  • “[T]he principle upon which one is charged as a continuing wrongdoer is that he has a legal right, and is under a legal duty, to terminate the cause of the injury.”
  • “The [statute of limitations question] involved on this appeal is one normally encountered where damages occur when water overflows agricultural land. On this general subject our decisions are conflicting,” id. at 143-44, 547 P.2d 338

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.