Skip to main content
· 1/27/1968

Atkinson v. Herington Cattle Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 436 P.2d 816
  • 200 Kan. 298
  • 1968 Kan. LEXIS 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant acted without malice or its legal equivalent when defendant took immediate measure to contain the water pollu tants and thus minimize its damages upon awareness of the problem
  • feedlot drainage contained bacteria and nitrates which destroyed plaintiff s water supply and injured his cattle
  • judgment for punitive damages following bench trial reversed because \the undisputed evidence on this point as a whole\ failed to establish requisite malice or wantonness
  • cattle feeder strictly liable for pollution of dairy farm’s water supply, citing Berry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.