Kearney v. Kansas Public Service Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no reversible error where no proffer was made of excluded evidence pursuant to K.S.A. 60-405
• K.S.A. 66-176 is penal in nature, is to be strictly construed and should not be expanded by implication
• allowed defensive use of collateral estoppel in cross-claim between defendants in comparative negligence case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).