· 10/18/1990
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. American Cyanamid Company, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 916 F.2d 1174
- 21 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20360
- 32 ERC (BNA) 1228
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324
- 1990 WL 156424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting \the use of dynamite and other explosives for demolition in residential or urban areas\ constitutes the \largest class 10 of cases\ recognized to involve an abnormally dangerous activity
- “[T]rials are to determine facts, not law. More precisely—for there is no sharp line between ‘law’ and ‘fact’—trials are to determine adjudicative facts rather than legislative facts.”
- “We are not required to follow even the holdings of intermediate state appellate courts if persuaded that they are not rehable predictors of the view the state’s highest court would take.” (citations omitted)
- “[n]o court is required to follow another court’s dicta”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Manion, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.