Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 10/24/2016

William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.

Citations

  • 840 F.3d 292
  • 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1808
  • 2016 FED App. 0261N
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 19106
  • 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,664
  • 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1145
  • 2016 WL 6156315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the record evidence did not show that plaintiff’s supervisors were aware of plaintiff’s alleged stress-related disability
  • holding that a plaintiff must show that they were “(1) a member of a protected class, (2) subject to an adverse employment action, (3) qualified for the position, and (4
  • explaining that \[d]ifferences in experience and disciplinary history\ can disqualify a plaintiff's proffered comparators
  • finding that employees were not similarly situated because of differences in experience and disciplinary history
  • suggesting that differences in “disciplinary history” could establish that a supposed comparator is not similarly situated to the plaintiff
  • finding that a “performance- based reason . . . supported by numerous performance failures” was a legitimate non- discriminatory reason for the plaintiff’s demotion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Gibbons, Stranch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.