Skip to main content
· 10/11/2000

Pram Nguyen v. City of Cleveland

Citations

  • 229 F.3d 559
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25246
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,329
  • 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 242
  • 2000 WL 1505090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there are instances in which “evidence of temporal proximity alone would be sufficient to support” an inference of a causal link
  • noting that there are instances in which \evidence of temporal proximity alone would be sufficient to support\ an inference of a causal link
  • stating that direct evidence includes a decision-maker's express statement of a desire to take action against employees who are members of a protected class
  • stating that direct evidence includes a decision-maker’s express statement of a desire to take action against employees who are members of a protected class
  • holding that one month could not support a causal inference without more
  • accepting that the denial of the proper pay increase with the plaintiff’s promotion constituted an adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, Moore, Beezer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.