Talley v. Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee cannot “force [his] employer to provide a specific accommodation if the employer offers another reasonable accommodation”
• holding that the defendant failed to accommodate an employee based on the employer’s refusal to allow her to use a stool on the same day she requested to use the stool, and the employee left during the shift
• holding that the defendant failed to accommodate an employee based on the employer’s refusal to allow her to use a stool on the same day she requested to use the stool, and the employee left during the shift
• holding that the defendant failed to accommodate an employee based on the employer’s refusal to allow her to use a stool on the same day she requested to use the stool, and the employee left during the shift
• noting that plaintiff could adequately perform her job at the cash register with the use of a stool
• noting that the central issue in that case was “‘whether the defendants ‘alleged refusal to provide [the plaintiff] with a reasonable accommodation converted her resignation into a constructive discharge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).