Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that minor \differences in ... job activities\ did not \automatically\ disqualify plaintiff's proffered comparators, at least where they held \related human resources positions\
• concluding that same-supervisor requirement does not apply to all factual situations; rather, comparators must be similar in “relevant aspects”
• holding that numerous age-related statements by management reflected a corporate mindset or discriminatory atmosphere
• holding that numerous age-related statements by management reflected a corporate mindset or discriminatory atmosphere
• holding that comparables need not be identical; rather, they need only be similarly situated “in all of the relevant aspects”
• holding that comparators “must be similar in all of the relevant aspects” (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).