William Jameson & Co. v. Morgenthau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that Hannaford may or may not have a good [refund] program to satisfy aggrieved customers, but .. . the Hannaford program is not relevant to my superiority determination under the class certification decision”
• “Rule 26(a)(2) does not allow parties to cure deficient expert reports by supplementing them with later deposition testimony, or the function of expert reports would be completely undermined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).