· 3/5/1923
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell
Citations
- 261 U.S. 290
- 43 S. Ct. 353
- 67 L. Ed. 659
- 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff utility company deserved a remedy for confiscatory rates
- holding that the plaintiff utility company deserved a remedy for confiscatory rates
- stating that ‘convenience must give way to constitutional rights’
- “The Constitution of Oklahoma[] … gives an appeal to the Supreme Court of the State, acting in a legislative capacity … , with power to substitute a different order and to grant a supersedeas in the meantime.”
- “The Constitution of Oklahoma [ ] ... gives an appeal to the Supreme Court of the State, acting in a legislative capacity ..., with power to substitute a different order and to grant a supersedeas in the meantime.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.