Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Notwithstanding the fusion of law and equity by [Fed.R.Civ.P. 2], the substantive principles of Courts of Chancery remain unaffected.”
• “Notwith- standing the fusion of law and equity by [Fed. R. Civ. P. 2], the substantive principles of Courts of Chancery remain unaffected.”
• “While [York] relied on § 16 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 (later Rev. Stat. § 723 and 28 U.S.C. § 384 (1940 ed.)
• “While [York] relied on § 16 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 (later Rev. Stat. § 723 and 28 U.S.C. § 384 (1940 ed.)
• abstention held applicable to federal attack, based on Fifth Amendment due process clause, on territorial statute which allegedly deprived proprietary schools and their teachers of their rights to property and to follow an occupation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).